🤖 Mitch's newsletter
Mitch's Blog
We cannot let this one pass. New bathroom bill would essentially make it illegal for trans people to use bathrooms in American airports. Don't be surprised when it's followed by national bills preventing people from being trans in public.
— Annalee Newitz
This is that idiot Nancy Mace's latest brainstorm. It pertains to any federally owned bathroom: Airports, museums, office buildings, parks, etc.
AOC:
The idea that Nancy Mace wants little girls and women to drop trou… in front of who, an investigator? If a woman doesn't look woman enough to a Republican, they want to be able to inspect your genitals to use a bathroom? It's disgusting.
Natasha Dumas at McSweeney’s: Reasons That I, a Trans Woman, Have Had to Use the Bathroom at My Workplace
This House Democrat Keeps Winning in Trump Country. Here’s What She Knows.
Marie Gluesenkamp Perez won a "long-shot Democratic campaign for Congress in a solidly Republican, heavily rural part of Washington State…. FiveThirtyEight estimated her chance of victory at a mere 2 percent. But she won, defeating a burgeoning star of the MAGA movement named Joe Kent," writes Michelle Goldberg at the New York Times.
Gluesenkamp Perez, whose father immigrated from Mexico, ran an auto shop with her husband and lived in a house they’d built themselves. Her campaign emphasized both her blue-collar bona fides and her support for abortion rights, and she was frank in her denunciations of Donald Trump’s authoritarianism….
But if many on the left were delighted by her victory, they were disappointed by how often she broke with her party once she was in office. Gluesenkamp Perez voted to scrap Joe Biden’s plan for student debt relief. She supported a Republican bill to bar the use of public lands to house migrants and a resolution censuring her colleague Rashida Tlaib for her anti-Israel rhetoric.
…
I’ve heard you say that there’s no “one weird trick” that will end the Democratic Party’s woes. But it seems like maybe the closest thing to one weird trick would just be recruiting more working- and middle-class people to run for office.
Yes. I don't think more lawyers running for office is the solution here.
Given that you won in a Trump district, you must have won some percentage of Trump voters. When you talk to people who voted for both you and Donald Trump, what do they tell you? Where is the center of that Venn diagram?
Probably cost of living and border security.
Was it just that they felt like you both cared about those issues? Or did they feel like you both had solutions?
It has been a priority for me. The world I'm living in, I'm going to the grocery store and seeing people take stuff out of their cart. Fentanyl is just running rampant. A lot of us felt like Joe Biden's administration did not take it seriously, and there was a very, very late pivot on the border.
I think there are voters who see Trump and I as real people who are candid. They don't agree with us about everything, but they have a sense that I'm telling them what I actually think and am listening to them with curiosity and honesty.
On the question of whether Trump is "marching us toward fascism."
I think one of the dangerous things about that line of questioning is that democracy is not based on a binary vote for president. It is a muscle in normal, ordinary Americans who are showing up to volunteer at school, who are helping their neighbors out, who have a relationship with their community. It is all of these ways that we live our lives. And so when you say it's just about one person, I think you damage the long-term muscle to resist a drift.
You've been forthright in support of the rights of trans people, which Joe Kent tried to use against you, especially when it came to things like trans women in sports. How did you navigate an issue that proved so difficult for Democrats nationally?
I do not think that is why Democrats lost the presidential race. He tried to come for me on it and it did not work.
Because it wasn't a priority for your voters?
That's right. In town halls and things like that, people are talking about, like, Spirit Lake and flooding in the Chehalis River Valley. I think views are nuanced on this, and there is some electoral liability for Democrats, but it's not an Achilles' heel.
She favors reforms such as expanding the House and ranked-choice voting as means of bringing greater representation to the US government.
I think 90 percent of Americans really do agree about 90 percent of the issues, and instead we are allowing 10 things to push us into camps that are not going to build a coalition that could actually pass laws. So power continues to accrue to the most senior members and the least representative districts.
The framework here is that it is a bipartisan, equally divided commission that is thinking in large terms about what will deliver the most utility, not something just for a particular area. If we want more normal, working-class people here, we need electoral systems that open the door to more people participating.
I think rural America has not been well served by single-party control, and I also think our current system means that the most bipartisan members in the middle are also the ones who have to fight for their lives every election. That's a lot of energy, right? It's exhausting. It's hard on your family, and it eliminates the deal makers.
You live in a community where Trump won. How many people in your district do you think voted for him because they want him to do the things he promised, like set up immigrant detention camps and use the Justice Department to take revenge on his enemies? And how many do you think voted for him because they don't believe he'll do those things?
When you're fixing a car, right, I would much rather have it make the same noise predictably. Like, it always clunks when I turn left. Whatever it is, a predictable problem is much better than an unpredictable one. And so that confidence that this person is not trying to make themselves acceptable to you. They're not putting out celebrity surrogates. They're just showing up, and you can take it or leave it.
YouTube is now the most popular podcast platform. I don't get it. I listen to 1-2 hours of podcasts daily, but I would not want to sit down and watch that much talking-head video.
Presumptive Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth is Trump's "most dangerous cabinet pick."
Hegseth has written multiple books describing is conspiracy theories that the US is ruled by a Communist conspiracy launched by Thomas Jefferson and Benjamin Franklin and which is now embodied in the Democratic Party, writes Jonathan Chait at The Atlantic.
He believes officers who obeyed orders from Obama and Biden — in other words, officers who did their sworn duty to obey the lawful orders of their commander-in-chief — are traitors who should be dealt with accordingly.
He believes Democrats are traitors who should be overthrown by any means necessary, and he makes no exemptions for any Democrat (including me!).
Chait:
A defense secretary with a tenuous grip on reality, who can’t differentiate foreign enemies from domestic political opponents, and who seems to exist in a state of permanent hysteria is a problem that the United States has never had to survive. The main question I was looking to answer when I started reading Hegseth’s collected works was whether he would follow a Trump command to shoot peaceful protesters. After having read them, I don’t think he would even wait for the order.